When I started building this gun I modified all the dimensions to allow a .22LR to be the caliber of choice. I then carried on manufacturing parts.
One day I realised that although I thought the gun would be long enough to be legal, I\'d better check. Anyway, it came up short. It needs to have a barrel length of at least 12\" and an overall length of at least 24\". At this stage I hadn\'t made the barrels so the easiest solution would be by extending the front of the gun, ie the BARRELS (unmade) and either the SHAFT or the FRONT SHAFT. For some reason, at the time, I decided to remake the FRONT SHAFT, but now I\'m not too sure.
The central shaft is split into three:
The MAIN SHAFT is not seen and goes inside the BOLT CARRIER, PAN and BREECH RING.
The SHAFT is the long section that goes between the BREECH RING and the BARREL RING (brass disc on right hand of picture) and screws into the MAIN SHAFT
The FRONT SHAFT is the section to the right of the BARREL RING and is supported in the RAIL FRONT which isn\'t shown. The FRONT SHAFT screws into the SHAFT and traps the BARREL RING.
In the pictures below;
The top picture shows how long the SHAFT and FRONT SHAFT should originally be. Below it is a barrel that is of the length I need it to be but positioned so that you can see how the front of the FRONT SHAFT and the front of the BARREL relate to each other and also the BARREL RING.
The bottom picture has had the extra long FRONT SHAFT fitted and the BARREL positioned correctly to give some idea how the BARREL RING now fits in. The BARREL RING is a lot further from the front of the gun now.
My question is this: Should I use this extra long FRONT SHAFT to solve my problem, or should I make a longer SHAFT? The main difference would be where the BARREL RING ends up. By design, it should be nearer the front of the gun than it currently is.